Compassionate Counsel Passionate Defense

group photo of attorneys and staff
Group photo of staff at Law Offices Of Smith & White PLLC
  1. Home
  2.  – 
  3. Criminal Defense
  4.  – Understanding Reasonable Suspicion in Washington State

Understanding Reasonable Suspicion in Washington State

by | Jun 12, 2024 | Criminal Defense, Evidence, General Defense Info

Understanding Reasonable Suspicion in Washington

Q: What is reasonable suspicion, and how is it defined across Washington State?

A: Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard that empowers law enforcement officers in Washington State to stop and briefly detain individuals when they have specific, articulable facts suggesting that someone may be engaged in criminal activity. This standard is less stringent than probable cause, which is necessary for arrests and certain searches.

Q: How does reasonable suspicion differ from probable cause?

A: Probable cause requires a higher likelihood, based on facts and evidence, that a person has committed or is committing a crime. It is often required for conducting searches and making arrests. Reasonable suspicion, however, requires fewer facts but enough that a reasonable person would suspect crime might be involved. It primarily justifies temporary stops for investigative purposes.

Q: Can you provide case law examples that illustrate how reasonable suspicion is applied in Washington State?

Examples from Case Law:

  • State v. Arreola (2012): This case involved a mixed-motive traffic stop in Washington, where the Supreme Court ruled that so long as there is an actual and conscious cause for the stop based on a traffic violation, it is constitutionally valid, even if there are other motives like investigating a DUI based on an uncorroborated tip.
  • State v. Kennedy (1986): The court here discussed scenarios where immediate descriptions given by victims or credible informants could create reasonable suspicion, validating quick police responses to potential crimes.

Q: What are some specifics regarding the application of reasonable suspicion in Tacoma, Lakewood, and Puyallup?


  • In Tacoma, reasonable suspicion might be utilized for traffic stops if a vehicle is observed committing minor traffic violations such as a broken taillight or erratic driving. These stops are scrutinized to ensure they are not pretextual, especially when they might lead to deeper investigations.


  • The application in Lakewood closely mirrors state guidelines and local precedents ensure that stops are justified based on clearly articulated and specific reasons, rather than on broad or vague suspicions.


  • Puyallup does not have distinctly different applications from what is standard in Washington. Like in Tacoma and Lakewood, officers must base their actions on specific, observable facts that suggest criminal activity to justify stops under reasonable suspicion.

Q: What implications arise if a stop based on reasonable suspicion is later deemed unjustified?

A: If a stop or detention is later found to lack reasonable suspicion, any evidence obtained as a result might be suppressed, according to the exclusionary rule. This ensures that improperly gathered evidence cannot be used in court, upholding the integrity of the judicial process and protecting individual rights.

Q: Why is it important for residents in these cities to understand this legal standard?

A: Knowledge of reasonable suspicion empowers residents to understand their rights during police interactions and to assess whether those interactions are lawful. It promotes transparency and accountability in law enforcement, encouraging a fair application of the law that respects individual liberties while maintaining public safety.

Conclusion: Understanding the nuances of reasonable suspicion is crucial for residents of Washington State, Tacoma, Lakewood, and Puyallup. It helps ensure that community policing practices are conducted within the bounds of the law, maintaining a balance between effective law enforcement and the protection of civil rights. For specific concerns or incidents, consulting with a knowledgeable attorney can provide tailored advice and help safeguard one’s legal rights.